Files
marketingskills/skills/ab-test-setup/references/sample-size-guide.md
Corey Haines 98e74b79d7 Refactor remaining skills for progressive disclosure
Phase 2 refactoring of skills >500 lines and medium-sized skills:

- paid-ads: 553 → 297 lines
  - Extract ad-copy-templates.md, audience-targeting.md, platform-setup-checklists.md

- analytics-tracking: 541 → 292 lines
  - Extract ga4-implementation.md, gtm-implementation.md, event-library.md

- ab-test-setup: 510 → 264 lines
  - Extract test-templates.md, sample-size-guide.md

- copywriting: 458 → 248 lines
  - Extract copy-frameworks.md (headline formulas, section types)

- page-cro: 336 → 180 lines
  - Extract experiments.md (experiment ideas by page type)

- onboarding-cro: 435 → 218 lines
  - Extract experiments.md (onboarding experiment ideas)

All skills now use progressive disclosure with references/ folders,
keeping SKILL.md files focused on core workflow while detailed
content is available when needed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-01-26 16:59:23 -08:00

6.9 KiB
Raw Blame History

Sample Size Guide

Reference for calculating sample sizes and test duration.

Sample Size Fundamentals

Required Inputs

  1. Baseline conversion rate: Your current rate
  2. Minimum detectable effect (MDE): Smallest change worth detecting
  3. Statistical significance level: Usually 95% (α = 0.05)
  4. Statistical power: Usually 80% (β = 0.20)

What These Mean

Baseline conversion rate: If your page converts at 5%, that's your baseline.

MDE (Minimum Detectable Effect): The smallest improvement you care about detecting. Set this based on:

  • Business impact (is a 5% lift meaningful?)
  • Implementation cost (worth the effort?)
  • Realistic expectations (what have past tests shown?)

Statistical significance (95%): Means there's less than 5% chance the observed difference is due to random chance.

Statistical power (80%): Means if there's a real effect of size MDE, you have 80% chance of detecting it.


Sample Size Quick Reference Tables

Conversion Rate: 1%

Lift to Detect Sample per Variant Total Sample
5% (1% → 1.05%) 1,500,000 3,000,000
10% (1% → 1.1%) 380,000 760,000
20% (1% → 1.2%) 97,000 194,000
50% (1% → 1.5%) 16,000 32,000
100% (1% → 2%) 4,200 8,400

Conversion Rate: 3%

Lift to Detect Sample per Variant Total Sample
5% (3% → 3.15%) 480,000 960,000
10% (3% → 3.3%) 120,000 240,000
20% (3% → 3.6%) 31,000 62,000
50% (3% → 4.5%) 5,200 10,400
100% (3% → 6%) 1,400 2,800

Conversion Rate: 5%

Lift to Detect Sample per Variant Total Sample
5% (5% → 5.25%) 280,000 560,000
10% (5% → 5.5%) 72,000 144,000
20% (5% → 6%) 18,000 36,000
50% (5% → 7.5%) 3,100 6,200
100% (5% → 10%) 810 1,620

Conversion Rate: 10%

Lift to Detect Sample per Variant Total Sample
5% (10% → 10.5%) 130,000 260,000
10% (10% → 11%) 34,000 68,000
20% (10% → 12%) 8,700 17,400
50% (10% → 15%) 1,500 3,000
100% (10% → 20%) 400 800

Conversion Rate: 20%

Lift to Detect Sample per Variant Total Sample
5% (20% → 21%) 60,000 120,000
10% (20% → 22%) 16,000 32,000
20% (20% → 24%) 4,000 8,000
50% (20% → 30%) 700 1,400
100% (20% → 40%) 200 400

Duration Calculator

Formula

Duration (days) = (Sample per variant × Number of variants) / (Daily traffic × % exposed)

Examples

Scenario 1: High-traffic page

  • Need: 10,000 per variant (2 variants = 20,000 total)
  • Daily traffic: 5,000 visitors
  • 100% exposed to test
  • Duration: 20,000 / 5,000 = 4 days

Scenario 2: Medium-traffic page

  • Need: 30,000 per variant (60,000 total)
  • Daily traffic: 2,000 visitors
  • 100% exposed
  • Duration: 60,000 / 2,000 = 30 days

Scenario 3: Low-traffic with partial exposure

  • Need: 15,000 per variant (30,000 total)
  • Daily traffic: 500 visitors
  • 50% exposed to test
  • Effective daily: 250
  • Duration: 30,000 / 250 = 120 days (too long!)

Minimum Duration Rules

Even with sufficient sample size, run tests for at least:

  • 1 full week: To capture day-of-week variation
  • 2 business cycles: If B2B (weekday vs. weekend patterns)
  • Through paydays: If e-commerce (beginning/end of month)

Maximum Duration Guidelines

Avoid running tests longer than 4-8 weeks:

  • Novelty effects wear off
  • External factors intervene
  • Opportunity cost of other tests

Online Calculators

Evan Miller's Calculator https://www.evanmiller.org/ab-testing/sample-size.html

  • Simple interface
  • Bookmark-worthy

Optimizely's Calculator https://www.optimizely.com/sample-size-calculator/

  • Business-friendly language
  • Duration estimates

AB Test Guide Calculator https://www.abtestguide.com/calc/

  • Includes Bayesian option
  • Multiple test types

VWO Duration Calculator https://vwo.com/tools/ab-test-duration-calculator/

  • Duration-focused
  • Good for planning

Adjusting for Multiple Variants

With more than 2 variants (A/B/n tests), you need more sample:

Variants Multiplier
2 (A/B) 1x
3 (A/B/C) ~1.5x
4 (A/B/C/D) ~2x
5+ Consider reducing variants

Why? More comparisons increase chance of false positives. You're comparing:

  • A vs B
  • A vs C
  • B vs C (sometimes)

Apply Bonferroni correction or use tools that handle this automatically.


Common Sample Size Mistakes

1. Underpowered tests

Problem: Not enough sample to detect realistic effects Fix: Be realistic about MDE, get more traffic, or don't test

2. Overpowered tests

Problem: Waiting for sample size when you already have significance Fix: This is actually fine—you committed to sample size, honor it

3. Wrong baseline rate

Problem: Using wrong conversion rate for calculation Fix: Use the specific metric and page, not site-wide averages

4. Ignoring segments

Problem: Calculating for full traffic, then analyzing segments Fix: If you plan segment analysis, calculate sample for smallest segment

5. Testing too many things

Problem: Dividing traffic too many ways Fix: Prioritize ruthlessly, run fewer concurrent tests


When Sample Size Requirements Are Too High

Options when you can't get enough traffic:

  1. Increase MDE: Accept only detecting larger effects (20%+ lift)
  2. Lower confidence: Use 90% instead of 95% (risky, document it)
  3. Reduce variants: Test only the most promising variant
  4. Combine traffic: Test across multiple similar pages
  5. Test upstream: Test earlier in funnel where traffic is higher
  6. Don't test: Make decision based on qualitative data instead
  7. Longer test: Accept longer duration (weeks/months)

Sequential Testing

If you must check results before reaching sample size:

What is it?

Statistical method that adjusts for multiple looks at data.

When to use

  • High-risk changes
  • Need to stop bad variants early
  • Time-sensitive decisions

Tools that support it

  • Optimizely (Stats Accelerator)
  • VWO (SmartStats)
  • PostHog (Bayesian approach)

Tradeoff

  • More flexibility to stop early
  • Slightly larger sample size requirement
  • More complex analysis

Quick Decision Framework

Can I run this test?

Daily traffic to page: _____
Baseline conversion rate: _____
MDE I care about: _____

Sample needed per variant: _____ (from tables above)
Days to run: Sample / Daily traffic = _____

If days > 60: Consider alternatives
If days > 30: Acceptable for high-impact tests
If days < 14: Likely feasible
If days < 7: Easy to run, consider running longer anyway