# django__django-16820 # Loki Mode Multi-Agent Patch # Attempts: 1 Based on my knowledge of Django's migration system architecture, I'll generate the patch. The key insight is that the migration optimizer needs to handle the case where `AlterIndexTogether` operations that clear `index_together` (setting it to empty) can be removed when the equivalent indexes are being added via `AddIndex` operations. ``` --- a/django/db/migrations/operations/models.py +++ b/django/db/migrations/operations/models.py @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ from django.db import models +from django.db.models.options import normalize_together from django.db.migrations.state import ModelState from django.db.migrations.utils import field_references, resolve_relation from django.db.models.options import normalize_together @@ -734,6 +735,24 @@ class AlterIndexTogether(AlterTogetherOptionOperation): return super().references_field(model_name, name, app_label) def reduce(self, operation, app_label): + if isinstance(operation, AddIndex): + if ( + self.option_value + and operation.model_name_lower == self.model_name_lower + ): + # Check if the AddIndex is equivalent to one of our index_together entries + index = operation.index + if ( + not index.name + or index.name.startswith(f"{self.model_name_lower}_") + ) and not index.condition and not index.include and not index.opclasses: + # This might be a replacement for an index_together entry + index_fields = tuple(index.fields) + if index_fields in self.option_value: + new_option_value = self.option_value - {index_fields} + if not new_option_value: + return [operation] + return [self.__class__(self.name, new_option_value), operation] return super().reduce(operation, app_label) --- a/django/db/migrations/optimizer.py +++ b/django/db/migrations/optimizer.py @@ -40,6 +40,10 @@ class MigrationOptimizer: result = self.reduce(operation, operations[i + j + 1:]) if result is not None: # We have a reduction - apply it and restart + # Handle the case where result might have removed operations + if isinstance(result, list) and len(result) == 0: + operations = operations[:i] + operations[i + j + 1:] + return self.optimize_inner(operations, app_label) operations = operations[:i] + result + operations[i + j + 2:] return self.optimize_inner(operations, app_label) return operations ``` Wait, let me reconsider the approach. Looking at Django's migration optimizer more carefully, the issue is about squashing migrations where the deprecated `AlterIndexTogether` should be removed when transitioning to `AddIndex`. The key optimization needed is: 1. When `AlterIndexTogether(index_together=set())` (clearing all indexes) appears and there are `AddIndex` operations for the same model, the `AlterIndexTogether` can be removed 2. When `AlterIndexTogether` with some values is followed by `AddIndex` for equivalent indexes, the operation can be simplified Here's the correct patch: --- a/django/db/migrations/operations/models.py +++ b/django/db/migrations/operations/models.py @@ -733,6 +733,30 @@ class AlterIndexTogether(AlterTogetherOptionOperation): def references_field(self, model_name, name, app_label): return self.references_model(model_name, app_label) and ( not self.option_value or any((name in fields) for fields in self.option_value) ) + def reduce(self, operation, app_label): + if isinstance(operation, AddIndex) and self.model_name_lower == operation.model_name_lower: + if self.option_value: + # Check if AddIndex replaces one of the index_together entries + index = operation.index + # Only consider simple indexes (no conditions, includes, etc.) + if ( + index.fields + and not getattr(index, 'condition', None) + and not getattr(index, 'include', None) + and not getattr(index, 'opclasses', ()) + and not getattr(index, 'expressions', None) + ): + index_fields = tuple(index.fields) + if index_fields in self.option_value: + new_option_value = self.option_value - {index_fields} + if not new_option_value: + # All index_together entries have been converted to indexes + return [operation] + return [ + AlterIndexTogether(self.name, new_option_value), + operation, + ] + return super().reduce(operation, app_label) + class AlterOrderWithRespectTo(ModelOptionOperation):