feat: add 33 skills from vudovn/antigravity-kit
- Added: api-patterns, app-builder, architecture, bash-linux, behavioral-modes, clean-code, code-review-checklist, database-design, deployment-procedures, docker-expert, documentation-templates, game-development, geo-fundamentals, i18n-localization, lint-and-validate, mobile-design, nestjs-expert, nextjs-best-practices, nodejs-best-practices, parallel-agents, performance-profiling, plan-writing, powershell-windows, prisma-expert, python-patterns, react-patterns, red-team-tactics, seo-fundamentals, server-management, tailwind-patterns, tdd-workflow, typescript-expert, vulnerability-scanner - Updated README: skill count 179 → 223 - Added credit for vudovn/antigravity-kit (MIT License) Source: https://github.com/vudovn/antigravity-kit
This commit is contained in:
94
skills/architecture/examples.md
Normal file
94
skills/architecture/examples.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
|
||||
# Architecture Examples
|
||||
|
||||
> Real-world architecture decisions by project type.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Example 1: MVP E-commerce (Solo Developer)
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
Requirements:
|
||||
- <1000 users initially
|
||||
- Solo developer
|
||||
- Fast to market (8 weeks)
|
||||
- Budget-conscious
|
||||
|
||||
Architecture Decisions:
|
||||
App Structure: Monolith (simpler for solo)
|
||||
Framework: Next.js (full-stack, fast)
|
||||
Data Layer: Prisma direct (no over-abstraction)
|
||||
Authentication: JWT (simpler than OAuth)
|
||||
Payment: Stripe (hosted solution)
|
||||
Database: PostgreSQL (ACID for orders)
|
||||
|
||||
Trade-offs Accepted:
|
||||
- Monolith → Can't scale independently (team doesn't justify it)
|
||||
- No Repository → Less testable (simple CRUD doesn't need it)
|
||||
- JWT → No social login initially (can add later)
|
||||
|
||||
Future Migration Path:
|
||||
- Users > 10K → Extract payment service
|
||||
- Team > 3 → Add Repository pattern
|
||||
- Social login requested → Add OAuth
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Example 2: SaaS Product (5-10 Developers)
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
Requirements:
|
||||
- 1K-100K users
|
||||
- 5-10 developers
|
||||
- Long-term (12+ months)
|
||||
- Multiple domains (billing, users, core)
|
||||
|
||||
Architecture Decisions:
|
||||
App Structure: Modular Monolith (team size optimal)
|
||||
Framework: NestJS (modular by design)
|
||||
Data Layer: Repository pattern (testing, flexibility)
|
||||
Domain Model: Partial DDD (rich entities)
|
||||
Authentication: OAuth + JWT
|
||||
Caching: Redis
|
||||
Database: PostgreSQL
|
||||
|
||||
Trade-offs Accepted:
|
||||
- Modular Monolith → Some module coupling (microservices not justified)
|
||||
- Partial DDD → No full aggregates (no domain experts)
|
||||
- RabbitMQ later → Initial synchronous (add when proven needed)
|
||||
|
||||
Migration Path:
|
||||
- Team > 10 → Consider microservices
|
||||
- Domains conflict → Extract bounded contexts
|
||||
- Read performance issues → Add CQRS
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Example 3: Enterprise (100K+ Users)
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
Requirements:
|
||||
- 100K+ users
|
||||
- 10+ developers
|
||||
- Multiple business domains
|
||||
- Different scaling needs
|
||||
- 24/7 availability
|
||||
|
||||
Architecture Decisions:
|
||||
App Structure: Microservices (independent scale)
|
||||
API Gateway: Kong/AWS API GW
|
||||
Domain Model: Full DDD
|
||||
Consistency: Event-driven (eventual OK)
|
||||
Message Bus: Kafka
|
||||
Authentication: OAuth + SAML (enterprise SSO)
|
||||
Database: Polyglot (right tool per job)
|
||||
CQRS: Selected services
|
||||
|
||||
Operational Requirements:
|
||||
- Service mesh (Istio/Linkerd)
|
||||
- Distributed tracing (Jaeger/Tempo)
|
||||
- Centralized logging (ELK/Loki)
|
||||
- Circuit breakers (Resilience4j)
|
||||
- Kubernetes/Helm
|
||||
```
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user